Memory Loss
Trap Normal

Memory Loss

  • View:
  • 3172




When a face-up Attack Position monster your opponent controls just activated an effect (except during the Damage Step): Negate that effect, and if you do, change that monster to face-up Defense Position.




 
 
AI Power Analysis
Negation/InteractionConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 6, 2026
61± 6/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic 61
Deck 61

Memory Loss — Power Evaluation

Final Score: 61 ± 6 · Confidence: Medium

  • Intrinsic: 61 · Deck: 61 · Meta: provisional
  • Primary role: Negation/Interaction · Secondary: Removal

Why it scores here

Memory Loss is a generic negation trap that cleanly disrupts opponent activations from face-up Attack Position monsters, making it splashable tech across diverse decks. However, it is entirely reactive—requiring opponent activation and a specific monster position—and does not generate value on its own. The trap's single-target negation and positioning change provide real interaction, but the lack of combo data and limited scope prevent a higher score.

Axis scores

Axis Score Evidence
Accessibility 55 Runs generically in 8 diverse decks (6 archetypes) with 1-copy standard, but requires setup and depends on opponent activation to trigger. (Observed)
Combo & Conversion 40 No combo appearances in evidence; as a reactive trap, it does not build boards or extend plays. (Inferred)
Resource Economy 48 Negating one effect is a 1-for-1 trade; the card is roughly neutral if it triggers, with no refuel or recursion. (Verified)
Effect & Interaction 68 Negates activated effects and forces positioning change to Defense, providing strong but single-target interaction limited to face-up Attack Position monsters. (Verified)
Material Utility 15 Trap cards have minimal material value; Memory Loss has no level, attribute, or race and serves only as chain fodder. (Inferred)
Resilience & Flexibility 55 Face-down setting avoids initial disruption, but the trap itself is a static resource vulnerable to Spell/Trap removal with no multi-zone flexibility. (Inferred)
Deck-Building Efficiency 78 Generic tech with no archetype lock, no brick potential, and 1-copy standard; cleanly splashable into any deck without restriction. (Observed)

Calculation

Weight profile: Primary role: Negation/Interaction (100%). Intrinsic ≈ 61, Deck ≈ 61, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck

Strengths

  • Generic negation trap splashable into any deck without archetype lock
  • Negates activated effects and forces positioning disruption (ATK → DEF)
  • Clean deckbuilding with 1-copy standard and no brick potential

Weaknesses

  • Entirely reactive—requires opponent activation and face-up Attack Position monster
  • Single-target negation; does not affect multiple effects or face-down activations
  • Does not generate card advantage or build your own board
  • Vulnerable to Spell/Trap removal once set

Counters / choke points

  • Spell/Trap removal (Harpie's Feather Duster, Mystical Space Typhoon)
  • Decks that activate effects from face-down or Defense Position monsters
  • Hand traps that negate before Memory Loss resolves (Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring)

Best use

Going-second interaction; negation and board disruption. Decks: Control decks, Going-second strategies, Decks with other negation pieces. Suggested copies: 1.

Evidence & gaps

  • Verified: Card text negates activated effects from face-up Attack Position monsters and changes to Defense Position; 8 decks running 1 copy each; 6 distinct archetypes including Cyber Dragon, Vernusylph, Madolche, Scareclaw; No explicit Once-Per-Turn clause in text
  • Observed: 1-copy standard across all 8 decks (100% consistency); Top deck partners are staple interaction pieces (Impermanence 50%, Ash Blossom 50%, Called by the Grave 50%); Included across multiple gameplay types (37.5% type-7, 25% type-10, 25% type-6, 12.5% type-4)
  • Inferred: Accessibility ~55: reactive effect requires opponent activation, but generic and broadly splashable; Combo conversion ~40: reactive negation trap with no board-building capacity; cannot be verified without combo data; Effect interaction ~68: hard negation, but limited to face-up Attack Position monsters only; Deckbuilding efficiency ~78: generic tech with no archetype lock or brick potential
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied — combo conversion is entirely text-based inference; cannot verify how often it triggers in extended play No guides supplied — no expert commentary on practical role or metagame value No banlist info — assumed 3 copies (unlimited in all formats) No usage statistics (StatisticsCard) — archetype inclusion % inferred from 8-deck sample only; may not be representative No metagame context or date — cannot assess whether 8-deck sample is contemporaneous or historical











https://metaduelist.com/
Top